Tuesday, May 05, 2009

CM: Young Mr. Boh asks why… church?

It was his first time in church; you could tell by his actions and reactions during your innovative, wit-filled, thought provoking, oh yes, biblical message!

The Thinker by Nayer

Feeling confident that this bohemian-looking, twenty-something would want to talk with you after that oh-so-cool presentation, you introduce yourself after the service. He says, “I’ve never experienced anything quite like this.”

“This is going well,” you say to yourself.

“How so,” you inquire.

He says to you, “Well, I don’t know. I mean, I didn’t understand anything that was going on. Why people were doing the stuff they did when they did it?”

“Oh,”
you reply deflatedly.

“But I liked the vibes.”

“Oh,” you mutter.
Regaining composure, you propose, “Would you like to get together for coffee to unpack your experience?”

“Sure.”



You are sitting in Peet’s sipping your latte, and he an Organic Pu-erh tea (your second indicator that he is not fitting into categories with which you are familiar).

His first question is, “Okay, so what is church all about anyway? Why church?”
Whew, he’s brought the ball back into your court. You’ve structured your church for growth and its working. Even just last night you listened to an Acts 29 (or fill in your church growth specialist of predilection __________) pod-cast.

You reply phlegmatically, “Well, we taylor our church service to connect with people like you.” (“Oops,” you wonder, “will that make him feel like a target market? And why didn’t he understand what was going on?”)
But this guy is unflappable, “No, I mean what is it all about, you know, epistemologically and ontologically, the stuff the really matters, the core, the essence. Why church? And what is church?” “Sip,” went the Pu-erh tea. “Gulp,” went the coffee!

Fortuitously, last night before bed, you read an article in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia where Geoffrey Bromiley asserted that the Church can be “described in several pregnant phrases!”

So rather than explaining to young Mr. Boh what the local church does, you dive in…

“The Church is:

  • the people or Israel of God (Eph. 2:12; 1 Pet. 2:9-10),
  • the household or family of God (Eph. 2:19; 3:15; 4:6),
  • the planting of God to bring forth fruit to His glory (1 Cor. 3:9; Jn. 15:1),
  • the temple of God (Eph. 2:21; Jn. 2:19; 1 Cor. 3:9; 1 Pet. 2:4),
  • the bride of Christ (Eph. 5:25),
  • the body of Christ (Eph. 4:15, 1 Cor. 12:12, 27)
  • a building (1 Cor. 3:10-15; Eph. 2:21),
  • a spiritual house (1 Pet. 2:5),
  • living stones (1 Pet 2:5),
  • a city on a hill,
  • salt and light (Mt. 5:13),
  • a shepherd and his flock (John 10:1-18),
  • a wild olive branch (Ro. 11:17),
  • dough (1 Cor 5:6-7),
  • an ambassador (2 Cor. 5:20),
  • a virgin (2 Cor. 11:2),
  • a golden lampstand (Rev. 1:20),
  • a chosen lady (2 Jn. 1),
  • a royal priesthood
  • and a holy nation (1 Pet. 2:9).”
“Sometimes I feel like a wild branch without a trunk,” he replies. "Okay, that makes sense." (“It does?” you wonder, yet continue with your musings on last night’s reading.)
“These pictures overlap and approach essential issues from different angles. Rather than canceling each other out (e.g. “Do we focus on evangelism or fellowship?”), they provide parallax to promote the birth and growth of vigorous, fertile churches.”

“Got it,” responds young Mr. Boh. “So how was what the Bible describes as 'church' reflected in what you did last Sunday morning?”
“Sip.” “Gulp."

Why
we do what we do is quite important to our ecclesiology.

Because the imagination is heavily involved in metaphor-based church living and evaluation—one pictures a palette of ideal possibilities—the modernist church leader will tend to imagine, for example, the ideal modern "temple," while the postmodernist will imagine, well, postmodern ways of being "temple," a gathered people possessed by the Living God.
And the imagination is engaged, whether modernist or postmodernist, always seeking to live not like living stones or ambassadors, but both concomitantly.

One-size-does-not-fit-all yet forms must always embody Scriptural essence.
Pastors, elders and all disciples who build upon the foundation of the Church—Jesus Himself—should use the Biblical metaphors to guide and evaluate their work. I.e. does the form of church we are living embody the essence embedded in the pictures Jesus gave to us?

The goal is to continuously move toward church-ness, how Jesus imagines His Church, whatever form that might take. And we want to use forms recognizable even to people like young Mr. Boh so that when he asks, why church? the answer—Jesus' presence among his people in the world—rings resoundingly true.

6 comments:

Unknown said...

I love your stuff. I admit to a wince at the "Israel of God" reference. The statement concerning Messianic Jewish believers from Paul has been hijacked by a replacement theology that is rampant today...using it as "the church"... sorry, but Jewish ministry guys hurt over this one almost as much as calling Israel "Palestine" in Bible maps...

Paul Klaw said...

Hi Randy,

I admit that I do not travel in the circles you refer to so am not sensitized to the problem you face. In any case, I really am sorry to have inadvertently stung you! I get backhanded slaps on other issues and know it is no fun. And I was simply citing Bromiley and wanted to faithfully transmit the quote, so I’ll let you take that up with him :-)

But I am comfortable with the first part of that metaphor as he states it, the Church as “the people… of God” as well as his other references, even though in my strategizing I refer to some much more than others. (Now that you mention it, I do not believe that I have ever used the “nation” picture in real life, while I heavily emphasize the “priesthood” of believers and “citizens”.)

The metaphors that I regularly use as references and guides for my teams are: God’s field, vine-branches-fruit, foundation-building-living stones, temple, shepherd-sheep, people-priesthood-citizens, household, body, bride-groom.

Thanks for checking in!

Shalom,
paul

scotty b. said...

Paul,

Nice narrative! This helps me think through some of the stuff we have been talking about in a practical way. It seems to put meat on the bones of the theoretical. I found the last paragraph most helpful. Thank you for your great insight and good thinking. Thanks for letting God use you.

Scotty B.

Ed Waken said...

Paul, fantastic as usual. The church is moving (slower that many would like and faster than many can endure) but lumbering along towards the presence of Jesus amongst His people as a family to pursue His purpose on earth. I hope to be able to see you soon. I miss being in fellowship with you! Blessings,
Ed

Paul Klaw said...

Hey Scott,

Thanks for chiming in. The hard part and the art of metaphors is that everyone, everywhere, in every time period had/has the same ones, yet because the Holy Spirit brings different individuals with varying backgrounds in diverse places together, the result — the local church — can only be unique.

So Dublin and Dijon could be quite different looking, yet both will have commonalities, and hopefully, especially the presence of Jesus! As Ralph Shallis wrote, The most magnificent palace cannot satisfy the young prince if the princess' presence escapes him.Cheers bro!

Paul Klaw said...

Hey Ed,

Wow, you captured a lot of emotion — hope and frustration — in one truth-packed sentence. Great to hear from you!

Louise and I will be at Equip this summer, so if you are in the neighborhood we’ll have to grab some café, and as the French say, remake the world :-)

Looking forward to seeing you!