Monday, December 11, 2006

Just imagine a church that...

A hindrance for many Europeans is their perception of the Church. They avoid churches in order to stay pure! They want to keep themselves clean from guilt by association (see Jan. 06 entries “Smoke, mirrors and incandescence”).
Others eschew church because it feels like meetings and school, when they are seeking spirituality and community.


One might say, “They can think what they like, but our church is not like that!” But you cannot convince them of that for as the adage goes, “Perception is reality to the one who perceives.”

A week ago, I attended a DAWN / GEM / Kontaktmission consortium in Basel, Switzerland where directors of European church planting missions deliberated various questions. One of those discussions centered on, “What is church?”

Paul Morris presenting the Christian Associates' philosophy of ministryBasel - November 2006

How would you answer the question, "What is church?"
(I admit to being less than satisfied when the consortium's discussion group recommended John Nelson Darby's definition of church as a worshipping, witnessing, working - social impact - community.)

Geoffrey Bromiley says that the Church can be “described in several pregnant phrases.” ("Church" in ISBE, vol. 1, p.693). Could it really be that simple?!

He asserts that the Church is the:

? people or Israel of God (Eph. 2:12; cf. 1 Pet. 2:9-10),
? household or family of God (Eph. 2:19; 3:15; 4:6),
? planting of God to bring forth fruit to His glory (1 Cor. 3:9; cf. Jn. 15:1f.),
? temple of God (Eph. 2:21f.; cf. Jn. 2:19f.; 1 Cor. 3:9; 1 Pet. 2:4f.),
? bride of Christ (Eph. 5:25),
? body of Christ (Eph. 4:15, 1 Cor. 12:12, 27).

Other pictures of the Church include:
? a building (1 Cor. 3:10-15; Eph. 2:21),
? a spiritual house (1 Pet. 2:5),
? living stones (1 Pet 2:5),
? a city on a hill, salt and light (Mt. 5:13),
? a shepherd and his flock (John 10:1-18),
? a wild olive branch (Ro. 11:17),
? dough (1 Cor 5:6-7),
? an ambassador (2 Cor. 5:20),
? a virgin (2 Cor. 11:2),
? a golden lampstand (Rev. 1:20),
? a chosen lady (2 Jn. 1),
? a royal priesthood and a holy nation (1 Pet. 2:9).

Does your church look like any of these 18 pictures? Of course no local church fully embodies all of the essential elements depicted in Scripture, but are your church's priorities moving it toward a resemblance of these images? My guess is that Jesus thinks they should!
Blaise Pascal said, “Imagination decides everything.” Could you imagine starting all over to begin a church that embodied the meaning embedded in those images? What would you do differently? What would it look like? What would your unbelieving acquaintances think of such a church?
What if you were to release and resource some under-twenty believers that seem bored with church, to begin a church where they lived out the essence found in the above Scriptural images, what might be the result?

Just imagine…

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Paul,
Thanks for the time you invest in preparing your blog. I find it stimulating and I am glad you are willing to live in the tension of staying committed to the church as it is, while at the same time aspiring to the church as it is not yet (and exhorting others to do the same). Forgive me for being a bit reductionist but what about a definition of Church as being ‘God’s lover’. Whether it is in the Old Testament prophets (e.g. Hosea or Isaiah) or in Jesus’ laying down his life for us I get a strong impression that God loves us with a passion that is definitely not politically correct – I mean who among us would persistently set out to seduce and win again the love of a wife (or husband for female readers) who is publicly sleeping with every Tom, Dick and Harry that’ll buy her a drink?! My belief is that God loves us passionately and that he wants us to love him passionately in return. To use the apostle Paul’s term, this passionate love will “constrain” us to be and do the people he wants to be (both in and outside the church). It is not a love without discernment but this love has a ‘wild abandoning’ side to it. It is ‘Wuthering Heights’ passion with a faith base and a happy end, rather than the warm syrupy cup of kindness that is used to substitute it. Why are Christians so afraid of passion? Are we afraid of losing control? Are we afraid of losing face? Why is it safer to be a Michal rather than a David in so many of our churches? Let me repeat that I’m not talking about unbridled flag waving, dog barking or dog laughing passion. But passion can be a deep-seated emotion that solidly grows with time and trust (faith). I am a passionate lover of Munster rugby. When I go to their matches I am not sitting warming the pews in the stands. I am part of the 16th man and if we don’t play our role in proclaiming the cause of the kingdom of Munster we will not win the prize! We too push in every scrum, jump in every line-out and defend the chalk of our try line. Another Munster man, and Irish rebel leader in the middle of the 19th century, Thomas Davis said: “Educate that you may be free!” I also believe in getting a solid biblical and theological education (because there is a lot of ignorance dressed up as spirituality in churches) provided that education frees us to love God passionately.
Yours sincerely,
Peadar Somers

Paul Klaw said...

Hi Peadar,

I’ve been reading a book by Roddy Doyle so I was already in an Irish state of mind when I received your comments!

Let me say, “yes,” “yes,” and “yes” again. I like the way you stated the situation, loving the church as she is in spite of her imperfections (noting that despite better intentions I too contribute to her flawed state), yet always pushing forward to see her become what Jesus would have her be. Very much like a corporate sanctification.

I wholeheartedly agree that we must be passionate people for our God, both individually and collectively. The Lover of our souls desires this. And if we are to catch the attention of a postmodern/postChristendom generation that is emotionally rather than intellectually guided, then we must be authentically passionate people for our God, like Dave a man after God’s own heart who could unashamedly dance to His honor and glory. Tepid Christianity was never good enough, but today, a stolid faith, while valid, will not convince young people to taste and see that the Lord is good.

You and I share the conviction that we should not be satisfied with simply a hot heart or a sharp mind for God, but rather desire a passionate heart that is constantly stoked by deep understanding of the Trinity through study of the Scriptures.

As Tom Julien says, the church was first born in the heart and mind of God, so the local body must always seek to grow and deepen to become more like Jesus’ dream church. The reason I attempt to push beyond a describing the church as “God’s lover,” is because I believe we need more concrete guidance toward being more and more like Jesus’ ideal of ekklesia.

So great to hear from and interact with you brother! Looking up, paul